In the field of cryptocurrency mining, miner performance directly determines the upper limit of miners' income. Recently, the three miners DG1S, DG2, and DG2+ launched by ElphaPex have attracted attention, and the technical parameters and actual performance of Ant L9, as a market benchmark product, have long been widely verified. This article will compare the two products horizontally from five dimensions: computing power, power consumption, energy efficiency ratio, algorithm compatibility, and applicable scenarios.
1. Computing power performance: DG2+ breaks through the 20G mark, and L9 dual versions cover the needs.
ElphaPex series
DG1S: 10G computing power (10000MH/s), positioned in the entry-level market, suitable for home miners or small mining farms.
DG2: 16G computing power (16000MH/s), the same as the basic version of L9, but with lower power consumption.
DG2+: 20.5G computing power (20500MH/s), becoming the computing power ceiling of the current Scrypt algorithm server, and the performance of a single unit is close to 2 L9 high-end versions.
Antminer L9: Provides 16G (16000MH/s) and 17.6G (17600MH/s) versions, of which the high-end version has a computing power close to DG2+, but it should be noted that the actual delivery volume of the 17.6G version of L9 is relatively small, and the market mainstream is still the 16G version.
Comparison conclusion
DG2+ has achieved a breakthrough in computing power, but if the 17.6G version of L9 is widely distributed, the gap will be narrowed. For users who pursue extreme computing power, DG2+ is the current optimal solution; if the budget is limited, the performance of DG2 and L9 basic version is close.
2. Power consumption and energy efficiency ratio: L9 has a leading energy efficiency ratio, and DG2+ power consumption control needs to be optimized.
ElphaPex series
DG1S: Power consumption 3100W, energy efficiency ratio 0.31J/M, suitable for areas with low electricity costs.
DG2: Power consumption 3520W, energy efficiency ratio 0.22J/M, close to the L9 level.
DG2+: Power consumption is 3900W, and the energy efficiency ratio is 0.19J/M. Although it is the same as the high-end version of L9, the absolute power consumption is higher, and the heat dissipation cost needs to be considered for long-term operation.
Ant L9: The basic version has a power consumption of 3360W and an energy efficiency ratio of 0.21J/M; the high-end version has a power consumption of 3570W and an energy efficiency ratio of 0.19J/M (some models are marked as 210J/G, and the units are consistent after conversion). Its dual-mode power supply design (220V/110V) enhances environmental adaptability.
Comparison conclusion
L9 is slightly better in energy efficiency, especially the high-end version is the same as DG2+, but the power consumption is lower. Although DG2+ has the same energy efficiency ratio, high power consumption may increase hidden costs, and a comprehensive evaluation needs to be combined with electricity prices.
3. Algorithm compatibility: L9 has a dominant support for multiple currencies.
ElphaPex series: The official has not clearly marked the supported currencies, but the Scrypt algorithm usually covers mainstream currencies such as Litecoin (LTC), Dogecoin (DOGE), Bell Coin (BEL), etc., and further confirmation is needed to confirm whether it supports multiple currencies at the same time.
Antminer L9: It clearly supports six currencies under the Scrypt algorithm (LTC, DOGE, BEL, LKY, PEP, JKC). The multi-currency mining capability can disperse risks and improve the return on investment.
Comparison conclusion
L9 is better in algorithm compatibility and is suitable for miners who want to diversify their layout; ElphaPex needs to supplement multi-currency support information. If it only supports a single currency, the applicable scenarios are limited.
4. Hardware design and stability: L9 has leading technology and excellent heat dissipation performance
ElphaPex series: The parameters do not mention the chip process, but the power consumption and computing power match well, and it is speculated that advanced processes are used; the heat dissipation design is not clear, and attention needs to be paid to long-term operation stability.
Ant L9: Using 6nm chip technology, dual-fan cooling system, controllable temperature when running at full load, noise 75dB (equivalent to DG series). Dual-mode power supply design further ensures stability.
Comparison conclusion
L9 has more experience in hardware technology and cooling design, suitable for high-intensity continuous operation; ElphaPex needs actual testing to verify the cooling efficiency, especially focusing on the performance of DG2+ under high load.
5. Market positioning and cost-effectiveness
ElphaPex series
DG1S: Entry-level choice, suitable for small-scale miners or testing purposes.
DG2: The main force in the mid-range market, directly benchmarking the L9 basic version, with similar energy efficiency and possibly lower price.
DG2+: Flagship product, aimed at professional mining farms, requires large-scale deployment to dilute high power consumption costs.
Ant L9: Positioning the high-end market, 6-month warranty and brand after-sales guarantee enhance its attractiveness, but the premium is high. Calculated at an electricity price of 0.4 yuan/kWh, the static payback period of L9 is about 1 year and 1 month, which is better than most competing products.
Comparison conclusion
If ElphaPex's pricing strategy is aggressive, DG2 may become a cost-effective alternative to the L9 basic version; DG2+ needs to attract mining farms that pursue extreme output with its computing power advantage.
6. Summary:
How to choose? If you pursue extreme computing power, choose DG2+, but you need to bear high power consumption costs. If you balance performance and energy efficiency, you can choose either the high-end L9 version (17.6G) or DG2+, but you need to compare the actual prices. If you have a limited budget, the performance of DG2 and the basic L9 version is similar, so you should give priority to the one with a lower energy efficiency ratio. If you need multiple currencies, choose L9 directly, as the algorithm compatibility is wider. In the future, as the popularity of Scrypt algorithm currencies changes, the server's ability to support multiple currencies may become a key competitive point. If ElphaPex can make up for its shortcomings in this area, it will be more competitive in the market.